Daniel Kirk Wrestling with Theological Interpretation

Over at Sibboleth, Fuller’s Daniel Kirk is wrapping up (I think) a series on theological interpretation that has run most of July and is quite a good introduction to the issues. Daniel is juggling a number of issues—all prompted in this series by his review of Steve Fowl’s forthcoming book on the subject. It’s worth spending some time with the various posts. Today’s post, written after considering the debate about historical criticism within the theological interpretation of Scripture, is entitled “What if we’re all right?”

Leave a Reply


google